Discussion:
The God called Government
(too old to reply)
M.P. Cathmor
2004-01-18 08:06:55 UTC
Permalink
I'm watching now the scenes from the explosion in Baghdad (just one more explosion in the perpetual chain of explosions)
on CNN. I also remember the wonderful web site, announced here a day or two ago, www.nationofhate.us
They are right, very right, those guys at the nationofhate.us . Our allmighty Government keeps screwing up one thing
after another and yet most Americans keep worshiping it, no matter what. Earlier today I saw a TV report from the funeral of one local US soldier, killed in Iraq,
when his helicopter was shot down. He was called a hero, who made an ultimate sacrifice (a cliche well overused and abused by journalists).

He did not offer any sacrifice, he was just murdered for no good cause at all. We've invaded Iraq, a country that has never incaded the US, and converted it
from a country with no terrorists into the country swarming with terrorists. We claimwe came to Iraq to establish there democracy, but two of the most democratic
countries in the region: Iran and Syria are actually our most profound adversaries, while all the tyranic totalitarian monarchies are our allies and friends.
(There are parliamentary elections in both Iran and Syria and women have full voting rights. Something Saudi or Kuwaiti women can only dream about. And if we
are so concerned about freedom in the world, why didn't we invade Iraq when Saddam was murdering thousands of his people, but chose to invade it when
dictator was behaving in the most civilized manner over all the decades of his reign? And why we allegedly care so much about the Iraqi people but have no interest
in liberating our next door neighboor, Cuba? Yes, something really resonated in my heart and my mind, when I was
visiting the www.nationofhate.us . Not too advanced technically, this site really touches your heart (provided it's not
yet totally numb) with its dramatic backgrounds, stunnigly realistic graphics, dynamic html and animated gifs. See for yourself at
http://www.nationofhate.us

M.P. Cathmor
P.S. I really grieve for those who died, even more for those who will die in Iraq. Their mothers and fathers, too. What a waste!
Osprey
2004-01-18 22:11:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by M.P. Cathmor
I'm watching now the scenes from the explosion in Baghdad (just one more
explosion in the perpetual chain of explosions)
Post by M.P. Cathmor
on CNN. I also remember the wonderful web site, announced here a day or
two ago, www.nationofhate.us
Post by M.P. Cathmor
They are right, very right, those guys at the nationofhate.us . Our
allmighty Government keeps screwing up one thing
Post by M.P. Cathmor
after another and yet most Americans keep worshiping it, no matter what.
Earlier today I saw a TV report from the funeral of one local US soldier,
killed in Iraq,
Post by M.P. Cathmor
when his helicopter was shot down. He was called a hero, who made an
ultimate sacrifice (a cliche well overused and abused by journalists).
Post by M.P. Cathmor
He did not offer any sacrifice, he was just murdered for no good cause at
all. We've invaded Iraq, a country that has never incaded the US, and
converted it
Post by M.P. Cathmor
from a country with no terrorists into the country swarming with
terrorists. We claimwe came to Iraq to establish there democracy, but two of
the most democratic
Post by M.P. Cathmor
countries in the region: Iran and Syria are actually our most profound
adversaries, while all the tyranic totalitarian monarchies are our allies
and friends.
Post by M.P. Cathmor
(There are parliamentary elections in both Iran and Syria and women have
full voting rights. Something Saudi or Kuwaiti women can only dream about.
And if we
Post by M.P. Cathmor
are so concerned about freedom in the world, why didn't we invade Iraq
when Saddam was murdering thousands of his people, but chose to invade it
when
Post by M.P. Cathmor
dictator was behaving in the most civilized manner over all the decades of
his reign? And why we allegedly care so much about the Iraqi people but have
no interest
Post by M.P. Cathmor
in liberating our next door neighboor, Cuba? Yes, something really
resonated in my heart and my mind, when I was
Post by M.P. Cathmor
visiting the www.nationofhate.us . Not too advanced technically, this site
really touches your heart (provided it's not
Post by M.P. Cathmor
yet totally numb) with its dramatic backgrounds, stunnigly realistic
graphics, dynamic html and animated gifs. See for yourself at
Post by M.P. Cathmor
http://www.nationofhate.us
M.P. Cathmor
P.S. I really grieve for those who died, even more for those who will die
in Iraq. Their mothers and fathers, too. What a waste!


Do you grieve for the soldiers that die on a daily basis during training and
non-combat roles?

Probably not.

You, like many others don't see the good that we have done for the people in
Iraq. It is unfortunate, but no one can help remove the blinders but
yourself.

Your post reminds me of some comments made by many democrats.

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That
is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We
want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal
here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear,
chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest
security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times
since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.
Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate,
air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to
the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction
programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct.
9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he
has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam
continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a
licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten
the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate
of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e
means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in
power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority
to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real
and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively
to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the
next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated
the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every
significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that
Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons
stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also
given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members
... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will
continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare,
and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam
Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for
the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is
real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003



"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last
visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has
reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological,
chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War
status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is
doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-
range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." -- From
a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham, Joe Lieberman, Harold Ford,
& Tom Lantos among others

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while
retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We
cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline Albright,
1998

"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all
weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its
agreement." -- Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence
reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet
achieved nuclear capability." -- Robert Byrd, October 2002

"What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with
the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such weapons in
the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past
four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has
continued armament programs." -- Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat
Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use
them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and
all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." --
Bill Clinton in 1998

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that
Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons
stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also
given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members,
though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible
events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked,
Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and
chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he
succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security
landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American
security." -- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in
1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a
warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those
trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of
2003

"Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass
destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them
against his own people." -- Tom Daschle in 1998

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our
allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam
Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available
means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already
used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build
more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons,
and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal." -- John
Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"I share the administration's goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons of
mass destruction." -- Dick Gephardt in September of 2002

"Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we
should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to
weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction
has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will
continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam
Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for
the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Bob Graham,
December 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
weapons of mass destruction." -- Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002

"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority
to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real
and grave threat to our security." -- John F. Kerry, Oct 2002

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandates
of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the
means of delivering them." -- Carl Levin, Sept 19, 2002

"Over the years, Iraq has worked to develop nuclear, chemical and biological
weapons. During 1991 - 1994, despite Iraq's denials, U.N. inspectors
discovered and dismantled a large network of nuclear facilities that Iraq
was using to develop nuclear weapons. Various reports indicate that Iraq is
still actively pursuing nuclear weapons capability. There is no reason to
think otherwise. Beyond nuclear weapons, Iraq has actively pursued
biological and chemical weapons.U.N. inspectors have said that Iraq's claims
about biological weapons is neither credible nor verifiable. In 1986, Iraq
used chemical weapons against Iran, and later, against its own Kurdish
population. While weapons inspections have been successful in the past,
there have been no inspections since the end of 1998. There can be no doubt
that Iraq has continued to pursue its goal of obtaining weapons of mass
destruction." -- Patty Murray, October 9, 2002

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the
proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave
importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the
development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to
countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection
process." -- Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998

"Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible
intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still
has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium
perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic
missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these
deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX
substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored
in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains
significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly
reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production." -- Ex-Un Weapons
Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively
to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the
next five years. And that may happen sooner if he can obtain access to
enriched uranium from foreign sources -- something that is not that
difficult in the current world. We also should remember we have always
underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of
mass destruction." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

"Saddam's existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a very
real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical weapons before, both
against Iraq's enemies and against his own people. He is working to develop
delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that could bring
these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle
East." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

"Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration's policy towards
Iraq, I don't think there can be any question about Saddam's conduct. He has
systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every
significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of
international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying
time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United
Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are
simply the facts." -- Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002
the other one
2004-01-21 15:22:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by M.P. Cathmor
Post by M.P. Cathmor
I'm watching now the scenes from the explosion in Baghdad (just one more
explosion in the perpetual chain of explosions)
Post by M.P. Cathmor
on CNN. I also remember the wonderful web site, announced here a day
or two ago, www.nationofhate.us They are right, very right, those
guys at the nationofhate.us . Our
[snip]
Post by M.P. Cathmor
Post by M.P. Cathmor
M.P. Cathmor
P.S. I really grieve for those who died, even more for those who will die
in Iraq. Their mothers and fathers, too. What a waste!
Do you grieve for the soldiers that die on a daily basis during
training and non-combat roles?
Probably not.
You, like many others don't see the good that we have done for the
people in Iraq. It is unfortunate, but no one can help remove the
blinders but yourself.
Your post reminds me of some comments made by many democrats.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is
clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
[snip]

*Thank you*. I've wanted a comprehensive list of the weasel lovers'
comments regarding the butcher of Baghdad before the war, and you have
provided it. I wonder why the media have ignored these comments?
Osprey
2004-01-21 21:31:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by the other one
Post by M.P. Cathmor
Post by M.P. Cathmor
I'm watching now the scenes from the explosion in Baghdad (just one more
explosion in the perpetual chain of explosions)
Post by M.P. Cathmor
on CNN. I also remember the wonderful web site, announced here a day
or two ago, www.nationofhate.us They are right, very right, those
guys at the nationofhate.us . Our
[snip]
Post by M.P. Cathmor
Post by M.P. Cathmor
M.P. Cathmor
P.S. I really grieve for those who died, even more for those who will die
in Iraq. Their mothers and fathers, too. What a waste!
Do you grieve for the soldiers that die on a daily basis during
training and non-combat roles?
Probably not.
You, like many others don't see the good that we have done for the
people in Iraq. It is unfortunate, but no one can help remove the
blinders but yourself.
Your post reminds me of some comments made by many democrats.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is
clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
[snip]
*Thank you*. I've wanted a comprehensive list of the weasel lovers'
comments regarding the butcher of Baghdad before the war, and you have
provided it. I wonder why the media have ignored these comments?
Probably the same reason the media will only focus on American deaths in
Iraq instead of focussing on the positive strides we have taken.
Left wing controlled media

Loading...